Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
3.
ESMO Open ; 6(5): 100274, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1446621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at a higher risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients undergoing treatment remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this interventional prospective multicohort study, priming and booster doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine were administered 21 days apart to solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted or hormonal therapy, and patients with a hematologic malignancy receiving rituximab or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Vaccine safety and efficacy (until 3 months post-booster) were assessed. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody levels were followed over time (until 28 days after the booster) and in vitro SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralization titers (NT50) toward the wild-type Wuhan strain were analyzed 28 days after the booster. RESULTS: Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate (only 1%-3% of patients experienced severe AEs). Local, but not systemic, AEs occurred more frequently after the booster dose. Twenty-eight days after the booster vaccination of 197 cancer patients, RBD-binding antibody titers and NT50 were lower in the chemotherapy group {234.05 IU/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 122.10-448.66] and 24.54 (95% CI 14.50-41.52), respectively} compared with healthy individuals [1844.93 IU/ml (95% CI 1383.57-2460.14) and 122.63 (95% CI 76.85-195.67), respectively], irrespective of timing of vaccination during chemotherapy cycles. Extremely low antibody responses were seen in hematology patients receiving rituximab; only two patients had RBD-binding antibody titers necessary for 50% protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (<200 IU/ml) and only one had NT50 above the limit of detection. During the study period, five cancer patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including a case of severe COVID-19 in a patient receiving rituximab, resulting in a 2-week hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The BNT162b2 vaccine is well-tolerated in cancer patients under active treatment. However, the antibody response of immunized cancer patients was delayed and diminished, mainly in patients receiving chemotherapy or rituximab, resulting in breakthrough infections.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , COVID-19 , Neoplasms , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Prospective Studies , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
4.
Annals of Oncology ; 31:S1031, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-805802

ABSTRACT

Background: There is a broad range of clinical presentations of a SARS-CoV-2 viral infection varying from asymptomatic, sensation of a mild cold or flu to severe bilateral pneumonia and death. Liang et al. already reported the most severe complications in cancer patients particularly when they had undergone chemotherapy or surgery over the last month. In absence of a vaccine or adequate treatment of COVID-19 current measures to minimize the infectious risk of SARS-CoV-2 in a cancer patient population are focused on social distancing and protective measures for the medical and nursing staff members, and in some settings also patients. As it is clear that a hospital is a high risk setting to contract COVID-19, one of the strategies we can use to treat cancer patients as safe as possible, is to reduce hospital visits to a strict minimum. Trial design: The COREO-trial is a non-randomized cohort study at the Oncology unit of the Antwerp University Hospital (COVID-19 reference center) and AZ Maria Middelares Gent, both in Belgium. This trial contains two groups. Group A consists of patients that undergo outpatient monitoring (blood sampling at home and monitoring side effects using a smartphone application). Group B consists of patients that are in the classical hospital setting (= control group). The primary objective is to assess whether patients having home monitored oncologic treatment (cohort A) have a lower risk to the develop (severe) clinical COVID-19 compared to patients having classic in hospital oncologic treatment (cohort B). The working hypothesis is that interactive outpatient monitoring and management within the COREO-trial allows high quality cancer care with reduction of COVID-19 related complications. Legal entity responsible for the study: Antwerp University Hospital. Funding: Antwerp University Hospital. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL